Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

A monitoring plan defines how progress on activities and expected results are measured. A monitoring plan is used to track the activities and accomplishments of a PHE program—allowing beneficiaries, project managers and donors to determine  the program’s success in meeting its goals and targets. An evaluation uses data-driven results to more comprehensively assess how well programs are achieving expected outcomes. In USAID funded programs, a monitoring and evaluation or M&E plan not only assesses how well program activities are leading to intended results, but also describes how the monitoring information will be used to learn from experience and how lessons learned will be shared. USAID has developed detailed guidance and training materials for PHE projects, as related to M&E, those documents can be found in this section. Examples of program evaluations can be found in the section "Current PHE Programs", "Country / Regional Experience", while broader studies that used additional methodologies are found in "Global Analysis and Assessment".

No Date | PATH Foundation Philippines Inc. [PFPI]
PATH Foundation Philippines Inc. (PFPI) views population management as an important element of the “best management practices” for coastal resource management (CRM). This hypothesis gave birth to the Integrated Population and Coastal Resource Management (IPOPCORM) initiative, which asserts that targeting the integration of the Eco-Social System is the “optimum approach to obtain synergies that will maximize their impact.”
2011 | Coastal Resources Center | 28
The purpose of the research presented here is to further evaluate the assumption that the integrated delivery of reproductive health and environmental management practices in one project results in added-value. Value-added is defined as meaning that the integration of the reproductive health and environmental management components will enhance the levels of success of each to the extent that their levels of achievement will be greater than if the projects were delivered separately.
2009 | Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
This training toolkit aims to increase the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) capacity, skills and knowledge of those who plan, implement, and evaluate innovative, integrated health and community development programs in low-resource settings. The toolkit provides managers, technical specialists, and M&E staff with user-friendly, modifiable training components to adapt for a specific developing-country and programmatic context.
2007 | MEASURE Evaluation | pp. 165
Emphasis is always placed on the “success” of development projects. Donors, stakeholders and critics tend to look for achievements that can be difficult to measure. This desire for measuring projects in an easy and quantitative method has lead to Monitoring and Evaluating (M&E) systems. M&E systems address the challenge of measuring program success in cost-effective, practical ways. This document is a guide to effective M&E of integrated projects and serves as a reference for the entire international development community.
2006 | PATH Foundation Philippines Inc. [PFPI]
From PATH Foundation Philippines Inc.’s Integrated Population and Coastal Resource Management (IPOPCORM) initiative comes this easy to follow wall chart. The flowchart shows the connections between coastal resource management, reproductive health interventions, and population-environment and the results of this integration. Indicators are presented following the results.
2004 | International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ THE WORLD BANK | pp. 26
Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) in the development community provides government officials, development implementers, and the civil society with means for learning from integrated development projects. The strong and growing emphasis on demonstrating and doucmenting results in development assistance projects calls for a quantitative evaluation approach. Performance indicators are discussed to aid in quantitative analysis for various sectors of an integrated project. This overview aims to strengthen awareness and interest in M& E and its’ corresponding indicators.
2003 | John Snow Inc. | pp. 20
Madagascar, a country of high biodiversity and where 80% of the species are endemic, has been bearing fast population growth linked with family health problems, rapid deforestation, unsustainable resource extraction, and a multitude of other factors detrimental to the country’s environmental health. In 2002 the Madagascar Green Healthy Communities (MGHC) project, linked with the Voahary Salama Integrated Programs initiative, was created in an effort to combat these issues.
2002 | Population Reference Bureau [PRB]
This paper addresses the rationale for including gender in Population, Health, and Nutrition Programs. It define gender and several aspects of gender in ways that make it easier to incorporate in programs, and suggests a framework for identifying and addressing gender-related constraints to achieving program objectives, using a detailed set of illustrative examples. The authors address a number of obstacles that project designers are likely to encounter, and offer indicators that have proven useful in monitoring of changes as a result of addressing gender issues.
1999 | International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ THE WORLD BANK | pp. 50
This document, published by the World Bank Environment Department, provides guidance on selecting Environmental Performance Indicators (EPIs) for evaluating projects either aimed at the environment, or indirectly affecting the environment. It gives advice on structuring indicators within a logical framework, and the general development of indicators. For the World Bank projects on environmental stability, EPIs are used. Emphasis is placed on the quality of EPI selection, and that a small set of well-chosen indicators is most effective.